Introduction

1001 movies you must see before you die. Must I? Let's see.

My name is Dagmar and I am from Czech Republic. I have a bachelor's degree in screenwriting. I study movies. I watch movies. I write about movies. I kind of mention movies a lot. I even cross stitch things I like in movies. My views on cinema could be described as peculiar. My views on the "1001 movies" list as complicated. It happens a lot that I get the feeling it wasn't that necessary to see some particular movies. Sometimes I'm really grateful I saw them. And there are also times when I don't watch any new movies for six months straight. And they keep adding new movies every damn year so I might have to never die to watch them all.

What's the score right now?
606/1245 - That's 639 left to see.
I started this experiment on July 3rd 2009 and the latest update was made on April 19th 2023.

You can find the full list here.

Wednesday, 22 January 2020

Mutiny on the Bounty (1935)

USA
directed by: Frank Lloyd
written by: Margaret Booth, Jules Furthman, Carey Wilson, Talbot Jennings + Charles Nordhoff, James Norman Hall (book)

starring: Charles Laughton, Clark Gable, Franchot Tone
seen on 22nd January, 2020

I wouldn't call the use of title cards between shots as a sign of a clumsy transition between silent and sound film, in fact I'm pretty sure that it's a sign of inexperience and quandary when adapting a literary source into visual language of film. I think it a good thing when dialogue serves mostly as a way to convey the complexities of its speakers' characters, it's not ideal when the talking focuses too much on moving the story forward. A novel has a different structure that a "traditional" film story arc, and I would say I remember commenting dozens (and perhaps hundreds) of times under all sorts of adaptations that only a minority of (Hollywood) screenwriters can masterfully translate (and not simply shorten) a book story, to make it make sense on the big screen as well. 

Other than that, it sure is a cool flick. I wonder what it would be like to see it when it was made. Also, could any of the actors pass as capable/make it big in todays cinema? Could any of their performances be called timeless? Even though his character looks the most like a caricature, I bet that Charles Laughton checks all the modern complex actor boxes. The other two guys would look like models struggling to act today. 

(I haven't read the book, nor have I seen any other adaptation.)

No comments:

Post a Comment

Please, keep the conversation classy. Much obliged.